Search for: "Barrett v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 1,127
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2024, 1:51 pm by Guest Author
  The lower courts dismissed the claim on the grounds that it was barred under the APA’s statute of limitations, which requires that claims against the United States be brought “within six years after the right of action first accrues”. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 11:06 am by Seth Davis
Under that precedent, the analysis was simple: “Here, DHS authorized certain nonimmigrants to work in the United States—just like in Washtech. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 3:56 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
In the United States, free speech is first and foremost a negative right of individuals against the government as reflected in the state action doctrine. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm by Susan C. Morse
The Court held that, under a statute providing a six-year limitation period for commencing a civil action against the United States, “a claim brought under the Administrative Procedure Act” (APA) accrues “when the plaintiff has the right to assert it in court. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:56 am by Josh Blackman
It's true that the Jan. 6 riot was a disgrace and an embarrassment to the United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:07 am by Harrison Blank
United States Philip Bobbitt, A Prudential Way Forward in Trump v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
The majority opinion was written by Justice Gorsuch and joined by Justices Thomas, Alito, Barrett, and Jackson. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by JB
” Does this resolve the question of whether the President is an “officer of the United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 2:55 pm by Ilya Somin
United States goes too far in granting such immunity to the president, though the exact scope of what they have given him is often vague. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:53 am by Andrew Weissmann
United States  suffers from shallow reasoning, lack of historical support, and distortion of legal precedent. [read post]