Search for: "Barrett v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2024, 1:51 pm
The lower courts dismissed the claim on the grounds that it was barred under the APA’s statute of limitations, which requires that claims against the United States be brought “within six years after the right of action first accrues”. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 11:06 am
Under that precedent, the analysis was simple: “Here, DHS authorized certain nonimmigrants to work in the United States—just like in Washtech. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 2:43 pm
I despise Cooper v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 8:50 am
(Illustration: Lex Villena; Free Speech Coalition)Yesterday, in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 3:56 am
In the United States, free speech is first and foremost a negative right of individuals against the government as reflected in the state action doctrine. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm
The Court held that, under a statute providing a six-year limitation period for commencing a civil action against the United States, “a claim brought under the Administrative Procedure Act” (APA) accrues “when the plaintiff has the right to assert it in court. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 7:51 pm
United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:56 am
It's true that the Jan. 6 riot was a disgrace and an embarrassment to the United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 8:24 am
United States. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:07 am
United States Philip Bobbitt, A Prudential Way Forward in Trump v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 4:30 am
The majority opinion was written by Justice Gorsuch and joined by Justices Thomas, Alito, Barrett, and Jackson. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 10:24 am
The immediate conflict in Moyle v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
United States? [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
” Does this resolve the question of whether the President is an “officer of the United States. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 5:30 am
Here are the discussion questions for United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:43 am
So, he says that Nixon v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 12:00 am
First, does United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 2:55 pm
United States goes too far in granting such immunity to the president, though the exact scope of what they have given him is often vague. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:53 am
United States suffers from shallow reasoning, lack of historical support, and distortion of legal precedent. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
" United States v. [read post]