Search for: "Barrett v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,059
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm
I am doubtful that Justice Barrett would have joined United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
In Sohm v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:47 pm
Almost 30 years ago, SCOTUS issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am
Barrett Financial * 512(f) Once Again Ensnared in an Employment Ownership Dispute–Shande v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 3:26 pm
United States (June 2023) was asked to review the issue again. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
Moreover, at least three important precedents--United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:39 am
United States immunity case arguments. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:35 pm
This clause states, in part, “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
Justice Barrett observes that immunity will protect the ex-President in his state court cases — where it is especially needed:Let me ask you about state prosecutions because, if the president has some kind of immunity that's implicit in Article II then that immunity would protect him in -- from state prosecutions as well. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
” Michael Dreeben argues for the United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:14 pm
S. 825 and Dolan v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am
State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Justice Barrett, writing for the Court, noted that the Court’s state action jurisprudence has largely focused upon “whether a nominally private person has engaged in state action,” not whether a state official had acted as a private citizen rather than a state actor. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
McCraw, also known as United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
§ 1512) that was at issue in yesterday's oral argument in Fischer v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
She told the justices that, on Jan. 6, 2021, a “violent mob stormed the United States Capitol and disrupted the peaceful transition of power. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:46 pm
Last month, we filed an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am
Whereas Warren Court activism was generally in the service of democracy, some of the most egregious Roberts Court decisions--gutting the Voting Rights Act, invalidating bipartisan campaign finance regulation, rendering challenges to partisan gerrymandering impossible, and much more--seem designed to make government in the United States less democratic. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 12:05 pm
Against this backdrop, we should be granting Pennsylvania's petition for en banc review, supported by 17 other states and the District of Columbia as amici, or at least holding it c.a.v. pending the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
