Search for: "Bartholomew v. YouTube, LLC"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2018, 8:23 am
In a recent California case, Bartholomew v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 9:19 am
YouTube, LLC, 2018 WL 5961898 (Cal. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 8:57 am
Google * YouTube Defeats Defamation Claim in ‘Remove-and-Relocate’ Case–Bartholomew v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 9:38 am
Case Citation: Darnaa LLC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm
In addition, IPSO published three resolution statements: 18927-17 Dixon v Daily Mirror: 18928-17 Dixon v Daily Express: 18929-17 Dixon v Daily Star: Statements in Open Court and Apologies We have already mentioned the apology of Ben Bradley MP to Jeremy Corbyn. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:10 am
”14 The Second Circuit in YouTube and the Ninth Circuit in Shelter Capital read this language very broadly, finding that even transcoding and indexing user-submitted content to facilitate its public playback was protected by the safe harbor.15 While Section 512(c) protects a service provider for many automated acts that occur after a user uploads content to the service, the one thing it doesn’t provide immunity for is content supplied by the service provider itself. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am
., et al. v. [read post]
