Search for: "Bartlett v. Strickland"
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2024, 6:27 am
The Court then turned to the applicable review in the current case, explaining that under Strickland v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
A. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
Bartlett that a plaintiff who alleges he was arrested in retaliation for speech protected by the First Amendment must show that police lacked probable cause to arrest him. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:08 am
Strickland, 2009). [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am
De Grandy and Bartlett v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:32 pm
Strickland and Thornburg v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
Jennings v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 6:39 am
Harris 15-1262Issue: (1) Whether the court below erred in presuming racial predominance from North Carolina's reasonable reliance on this Court's holding in Bartlett v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
In the same Term that the Court avoided the constitutional question in NAMUDNO, it used the same avoidance canon to narrowly construe a different provision of the Voting Rights Act in Bartlett v Strickland, and it applied constitutional avoidance (in deed if not in name) to narrowly construe Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act in Ricci v DeStefano, the controversial New Haven firefighters case. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:24 am
His opinion in Bartlett v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:50 am
And from the tea leaves of recent cases, and particularly the Section 2 case of Bartlett v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Sudbury, MA Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2005. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:26 am
Strickland and NAMUDNO v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:21 am
(Bartlett v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 8:30 am
See this AP report. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 8:13 am
Students cover NAMUDNO and Bartlett v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 10:14 pm
Ct. 1456 (2009), Bartlett v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 1:07 pm
Strickland (07-689) and Negusie v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 12:47 pm
I've already blogged about Justice Kennedy's reliance on the canon of constitutional avoidance in his recent plurality opinion in Bartlett v. [read post]
