Search for: "Bartlett v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2013, 6:14 am
In Sun Capital Partners III LP v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 12:48 pm
Match-up No. 14 (15) United States v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:08 pm
Your commission as Attorney General of the United States will be noted in the records of the court. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:47 am
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Mar. 26 in the battle over access to a drug used in medication abortions, which account for over half of all abortions performed in the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 2:13 pm
United States (Wednesday, Dec. 5) This post was originally published at Howe on the Court. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:30 am
Yet by the majority’s lights, the very act of creating that requirement in order to “safeguard the consumer,” United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 10:01 am
That year, the Court handed down Hamdan v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 5:54 am
Rather, the Court stated that “Section 10(b) reaches the use of a manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance only in connection with the purchase or sale of a security listed on an American stock exchange, and the purchase or sale of any other security in the United States. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:35 am
Bartlett Tree Expert Co. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
The plaintiff in Arters asserted a “design defect”/“remove from the market” claim à la Bartlett v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:07 am
Venard had signed as a condition of his membership with the United States Hang Gliding and Paragliding Association (USHPA). [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 5:21 pm
Shirer won in State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 6:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
In the same Term that the Court avoided the constitutional question in NAMUDNO, it used the same avoidance canon to narrowly construe a different provision of the Voting Rights Act in Bartlett v Strickland, and it applied constitutional avoidance (in deed if not in name) to narrowly construe Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act in Ricci v DeStefano, the controversial New Haven firefighters case. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
Bartlett, 133 S. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 6:50 am
In Llorca v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:02 pm
As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 1:01 pm
Bartlett, and Virginia argued Virginia House of Delegates v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 12:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 3:50 am
At the National Conference of State Legislators’ blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Allen v. [read post]
