Search for: "Barton v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 409
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2024, 9:56 am by Josh Blackman
I think Barton Swaim's editorial in the WSJ accurately captures how to think about January 6. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on Thursday 20 June 2024 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) handed down a unanimous judgment in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Styen J handed down judgement in the case of Prospect v Evans [2024] EWHC 1533 (KB). [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
On 21 May 2024, judgment was handed down in R (On the application of National Council for Civil Liberties) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin). [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
Also on the same day, there was a preliminary issues hearing in the case of Jeremy Vine v Joey Barton KB-2024-000733. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am by INFORRM
The FT Group’s Chief Executive stated that it is right, “that AI platforms pay publishers for the use of their material. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
   From In Custodia Legis: "A history of blasphemy laws in the United States"; "Clara Barton and the Geneva Convention. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
BCL 623 (k), for example, contains the so-called “fraud or illegality” exception to the exclusive appraisal remedy permitting a shareholder faced with the prospect of loss of an equity interest resulting from a cash-out merger to which he or she dissents to bring an “appropriate action to obtain relief on the ground that such corporate action will be or is unlawful or fraudulent as to him,” language New York’s highest court has construed to be limited “equitable… [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 2:39 pm
In that case, maybe just read the first footnote:"Originating from United States Supreme Court precedent in Barton v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 11:19 am by Rob Jordan
Barton “Buzz” Thompson served as special master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 11:56 am
§ 1229b(d)(1)(B) provides that once a conviction renders a noncitizen removable, the commission of an underlying offense is deemed to terminate the seven years of continuous residence required to be eligible for cancellation of removal; (ii) the Supreme Court adopted this interpretation in Barton v. [read post]
Here, Professor Buzz Thompson, a global expert on water and natural resources who has served as Special Master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Buzzard (Major Crimes Act; Discovery; Cherokee Nation) United States v. [read post]