Search for: "Basic, Inc. v. Levinson"
Results 41 - 60
of 226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2014, 9:22 am
The case has potentially far-ranging implications for the survival of the Court’s landmark ruling in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 6:25 am
Adopted in 1988 in Basic v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 2:47 pm
The first is whether the Supreme Court should overrule or modify its decision in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:06 am
Supreme Court upheld the legal standard for reliance in Rule 10b-5 securities fraud class actions that it had established some 25 years ago in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:00 pm
It discusses Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 7:31 am
John Fund, presents the kind of question the Justices don’t often consider: “Whether the Court should overrule or substantially limit the holding of Basic Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
The district court held that under Rule 23(b), the requirement that all class members prove reliance may be presumed under the fraud-on-the-market doctrine of Basic Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:17 am
In Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 6:29 am
(“Halliburton II”), [2] which held that defendants have the right to rebut the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance created by Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:16 pm
Supreme Court in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 6:38 am
John Fund, Inc., No. 13-317 on the question of: "(1) Whether this Court should overrule or substantially modify the holding of Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 9:53 pm
(PDF) Basic Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 5:32 am
[2] Basic Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 11:50 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 8:18 am
John Fund, Inc., involving the continuing validity of Basic Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 8:00 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 5:05 am
The Supreme Court in Halliburton II reaffirmed the Basic v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 12:10 pm
The district court found that all class certification requirements had been met, and that the investors had introduced sufficient evidence of market efficiency to justify the invocation of what is known as the Basic presumption, created by the Supreme Court in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 9:53 am
In Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 1:24 pm
Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case involving the continued efficacy of the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance in securities fraud actions endorsed by the Court in its 1988 ruling in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
