Search for: "Basic, Inc. v. Levinson" Results 41 - 60 of 197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2008, 1:48 am
Sept. 30, 2008), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the fraud-on-the-market doctrine established in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 1:48 am
Sept. 30, 2008), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the fraud-on-the-market doctrine established in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 9:22 am by Steven Hong
  The case has potentially far-ranging implications for the survival of the Court’s landmark ruling in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 2:47 pm by Federalist Society
The first is whether the Supreme Court should overrule or modify its decision in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
Supreme Court upheld the legal standard for reliance in Rule 10b-5 securities fraud class actions that it had established some 25 years ago in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 7:31 am by Ronald Mann
John Fund, presents the kind of question the Justices don’t often consider: “Whether the Court should overrule or substantially limit the holding of Basic Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 6:38 am by Bexis
John Fund, Inc., No. 13-317 on the question of: "(1) Whether this Court should overrule or substantially modify the holding of Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 6:29 am
(“Halliburton II”), [2] which held that defendants have the right to rebut the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance created by Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 8:18 am by John Elwood
John Fund, Inc., involving the continuing validity of Basic Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 12:10 pm
  The district court found that all class certification requirements had been met, and that the investors had introduced sufficient evidence of market efficiency to justify the invocation of what is known as the Basic presumption, created by the Supreme Court in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 1:24 pm by James Hamilton
Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case involving the continued efficacy of the fraud-on-the-market presumption of reliance in securities fraud actions endorsed by the Court in its 1988 ruling in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]