Search for: "Basic, Inc. v. Levinson" Results 61 - 80 of 226
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2015, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Fifth Circuit rejected plaintiffs’ argument that this reasoning was inconsistent with the fraud-on-the-market presumption recognized by the Supreme Court in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:29 am by John Jascob
The second challenge to the Ninth Circuit opinion takes issue with its application of Basic Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 10:42 am by John Stigi
  The Court, however, also agreed with the district court that Morgan Stanley’s alleged failure to make a required Item 303 disclosure was an omission that, if “material” to investors as defined by Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 1:35 am by Andrew Trask
 In its second review of the Halliburton case, the Supreme Court upheld the “fraud on the market” presumption of Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:46 am by Kevin LaCroix
”     Discussion At a very basic level, the Fifth Circuit’s ruling in this case is noteworthy because it is the Fifth Circuit’s ruling. [read post]
Supreme Court upheld the legal standard for reliance in Rule 10b-5 securities fraud class actions that it had established some 25 years ago in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 12:10 pm
  The district court found that all class certification requirements had been met, and that the investors had introduced sufficient evidence of market efficiency to justify the invocation of what is known as the Basic presumption, created by the Supreme Court in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 10:39 pm by Jarod Bona
As we explained in a previous post, the Supreme Court in this case agreed to reconsider its 1988 decision in Basic v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm by Andrew Pincus
John Fund – in which the Court left in place the Basic v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 2:58 pm by James Hamilton
By a 6-3 vote, the Court re-endorsed the presumption of reliance despite strong entreaties to overrule the 1988 Court ruling in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
John Fund, No. 13-317, much of the discussion focused on the practical realities of securities litigation, including (i) the procedures available to defendants to rebut the presumption of classwide reliance established in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 7:19 pm by James Hamilton
This means that the concurring opinion tempers the Court's ruling endorsing the fraud on the market presumption of reliance in securities fraud cases announced in the 1988 Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:44 pm by Amanda Hairston
In Halliburton, the Supreme Court refused to overturn its decision in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 2:47 pm by Federalist Society
The first is whether the Supreme Court should overrule or modify its decision in Basic Inc. v. [read post]