Search for: "Basic, Inc. v. Levinson" Results 81 - 100 of 226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2021, 1:44 pm by Lyle Roberts
  The questions presented in the case are: (1) Whether a defendant in a securities class action may rebut the presumption of classwide reliance recognized in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 9:41 pm
  The ruling turned on applicability of the "fraud on the market" presumption of reliance under Basic Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:06 pm by Daniel Dunne
”  Since the parties did not dispute that the market for Halliburton stock was efficient, the Fund invoked the Supreme Court’s decision in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:26 pm
The Fifth Circuit's decertification order hinges on its conclusion that neither the Affiliated Ute nor the Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 11:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 The Supreme Court first recognized this presumption in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 10:43 am by William McGrath
The Courts appear to disagree about the meaning of a footnote from the Supreme Court's ruling in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 10:25 am by Barry Barnett
Justice Kennedy (and Justice Scalia) sat on the Court that handed down Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
This securities class action relies on the “fraud-on-the-market” theory, which was validated in the 1988 Supreme Court decision, Basic Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 11:00 am by Lyle Denniston
John Fund — reconsideration of the 1988 decision in Basic Inc. v. [read post]