Search for: "Bass v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2020, 1:00 am by Podetize
Bass takes us into his book Unlikely Heroes, which is a vivid account of the implementation of Brown v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 3:17 pm by fvanloon
” We filed the motion in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California on behalf of former Congressman Darrell Issa (a candidate for California’s 50thCongressional District in the November election) and four voters from across the political spectrum (Darrell Issa, et al, v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:46 am by Hayleigh Bosher
[Although, during the trial, Skidmore’s witness, guitarist Kevin Hanson, was able to perform two versions of the Taurus deposit copy—one with just the bass clef part and one with the treble and bass clef parts together.] [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:41 am by Yi W. Stewart
Rather than acknowledging a fiduciary’s consent as “lawful consent” under the federal statute (id.; see Ajemian v Yahoo! [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
Then, on July 6, he purchased a second Glock pistol from Bass Pro Shops. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm by Erik J. Heels
During the event, fellow Log alum, bass, and MIT professor Ed Moriarty took a selfie my wife, Rebecca, and me (while we were also taking a selfie). [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 8:54 am by Ben
This judgment seems fallacious in relying on Walden v Fiore as this judgment doesn’t cover situations where the defendant has minimum contacts with the United States and any of the states within itself. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 12:38 am by Pamela C. Maloney
The Sixth Circuit also affirmed the lower court’s finding that it lacked personal jurisdiction over one member of the group (Parker v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Adam Garson
 The case, Willia Dean Parker and Rose Banks v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, the policy underlying the rule established in Carmel v Lunney, does not require dismissal of the entirety of plaintiff’s legal malpractice claim, because the remainder of his claim that defendants failed to advise him of the potential immigration consequences of traveling outside the United States as a result of entering a guilty plea does not dispute the validity of his conviction (see generally Carmel v Lunney; see also Bass & Ullman… [read post]