Search for: "Bass v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2017, 4:55 am by New Hampshire Employment Law Letter
While the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has declared that the term “sex” in Title VII includes transgender protection, that interpretation hasn’t been vetted extensively by the courts and may not be resolved until United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8]  Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:50 am by Broc Romanek
Applying Morrison, Second Circuit Affirms UBS Credit Crisis Securities Suit Dismissal As Kevin LaCroix explains in his blog, after the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Morrison v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:41 am by Yi W. Stewart
Rather than acknowledging a fiduciary’s consent as “lawful consent” under the federal statute (id.; see Ajemian v Yahoo! [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
However, when hedge fund trader Kyle Bass used such a strategy of shorting pharmaceutical companies after challenging their patents, he caused outcry from the pharmaceutical industry and some Congresspersons. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:25 pm
  Not to be confused with another preemption decision, Funk v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 6:19 am
So I found a cubicle in Bass Library one day and went to work. [read post]
26 May 2017, 4:17 am by Jon Hyman
“Saying It’s So, Doesn’t Make It So”—Independent Contractor v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 4:17 am by Jon Hyman
“Saying It’s So, Doesn’t Make It So”—Independent Contractor v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to… [read post]