Search for: "Bass v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 319
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm by Jennifer Simon, Esq.
  The case is captioned as Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:47 am by tracey
Supreme Court The Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council [2012] UKSC 34 (18 July 2012) Munir & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 32 (18 July 2012) Alvi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 33 (18 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Horn & Ors v Commercial Acceptances Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 958 (19 July 2012)… [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:52 pm by Michelle Yeary
              We have not hidden our dislike for Hughes (here) and we are not overly fond of Bass v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:34 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Court’s Ruling The Court anchored its analysis by acknowledging the “continuing validity” of the rule stated in Swierkiewicz v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:12 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The defendants taken into custody today are expected to make their initial appearances before United States Magistrate Judge William V. [read post]
3 May 2012, 1:12 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The defendants taken into custody today are expected to make their initial appearances before United States Magistrate Judge William V. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am by Mandelman
    So, do you remember the article I posted the other day about accounting for a pool of loans and how values are based on assumptions about the performance of the pool into the future? [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:42 pm by WIMS
      The Appeals Court ruled, "We reject both arguments, concluding that venue for the false statement charge was proper in the District of Maryland and that Maryland and Virginia's interest in striped bass was sufficient to make the States 'victims' and therefore to justify an award to them of restitution. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:13 pm by Bexis
Since Riegel hinges preemption on device specific requirements, which the GMPs are not, and because TwIqbal does not allow discovery based upon inadequate pleadings, Gross thus disagreed with the Fifth Circuit bootstrap approach in Bass v. [read post]