Search for: "Bass v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 243
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 5:37 am by Amanda Pickens
Bass v. 817 Corp., et. al., No. 2:16-cv-1964 (June 15, 2016 D.S.C.) [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 11:30 am
Especially when you're at a white shoe firm like Skadden Arps.So when Justice Willhite wrote last month that counsel for defendants -- Joren Bass, Richard Zuromski, and Raoul Kennedy -- repeatedly "misled" the Court of Appeal, including at oral argument, by stating a certain fact that wasn't true, you can understand why these attorneys might have been more than a little bit bummed. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 3:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As issues of fact remain regarding whether defendant was discharged for cause, summary judgment is not warranted on plaintiff's account stated claim (see EMC Iron Works v Regal Constr. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 12:46 am by Kevin LaCroix
On January 12, 2018, the Supreme Court decided to take up one of these cases, Lucia v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, the policy underlying the rule established in Carmel v Lunney, does not require dismissal of the entirety of plaintiff’s legal malpractice claim, because the remainder of his claim that defendants failed to advise him of the potential immigration consequences of traveling outside the United States as a result of entering a guilty plea does not dispute the validity of his conviction (see generally Carmel v Lunney; see also Bass & Ullman… [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 12:00 am
Brenda Bass—and did not name her as an inventor. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  She is pictured with another Honorary Fellow, David V. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 11:20 am by Gregory Forman
United States Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson’s wry if not cynical observation, concurring in Brown v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 2:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Indeed, nothing in the record shows that but for defendant's negligence, plaintiff would have been awarded a larger distribution of the marital estate or received a better settlement in the matrimonial action (see Katebi v Fink, 51 AD3d 424, 425 [1st Dept 2008]; Russo v Feder, Kaszovitz, Isaacson, Weber, Skala & Bass, 301 AD2d 63, 67 [1st Dept 2002]). [read post]