Search for: "Bates v. Clark"
Results 21 - 40
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2018, 5:53 am
Stephanie Zable analyzed the Supreme Court ruling in Dimaya v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:43 am
The first is Shular v. [read post]
Case Comment: R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [2014] UKSC 62
14 May 2015, 1:59 am
Lord Hodge (with whom Lords Clarke, Wilson and Toulson agreed) held that the licences granted to ZH and CN were not licences to occupy premises as a dwelling. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 6:07 am
Victoria Clark posted their joint statement. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 11:10 am
Robert Chesney provided an in-depth analysis of the legal and policy lessons learned from Doe v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
BAI Ltd v Thomas Bates and Son Ltd, BAI Ltd v Durham, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance Company and Adur District Council and Ors, Independent Insurance Company Ltd v Fleming and Anor, Municipal Mutual Insurance Company v Zurich Insurance Company and Ors, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Edwards, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Akzo Nobel UK Ltd and Excess… [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
At the end of the book, Professor Ackerman disarmingly acknowledges that he’s “fail[ed] to integrate the voices of movement activists,” but I believe the failure distorts the story he tells, for an accurate list of crucial catalysts would include many women, such as Diane Nash, Septima Clark, Autherine Lucy, Ida Wells-Barnett, Jo Ann Gibson Robinson, Ella Baker, Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, Daisy Bates, and Pauli Murray (to name just a few) as well as John… [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
At the end of the book, Professor Ackerman disarmingly acknowledges that he’s “fail[ed] to integrate the voices of movement activists,” but I believe the failure distorts the story he tells, for an accurate list of crucial catalysts would include many women, such as Diane Nash, Septima Clark, Autherine Lucy, Ida Wells-Barnett, Jo Ann Gibson Robinson, Ella Baker, Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, Daisy Bates, and Pauli Murray (to name just a few) as well as John… [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
Ed Bates wonders whether the application of the Attorney General’s proposals would make any material difference to the Court’s decisions. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 11:32 am
In Malcolm, the Court of Appeal held it was bound by its own judgment in Clark v TDG Ltd (t/a Novacold) [1999] EWCA Civ 1091. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 7:06 pm
Ct. 999 (2008), Bates v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 10:13 am
I’ll start you off with the motion to exclude , the opposition, and a declaration submitted by John Bates Clark Medal / Nobel Prize winner Daniel McFadden in support of the motion to exclude. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:08 am
If enacted, rules outlined in the “Issues Paper” will have many deleterious effects: The ABA’s proposed actions will cause a chilling effect on a lawyer’s right to commercial free speech, first established in In Bates v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:24 pm
If enacted, rules outlined in the “Issues Paper” will have many deleterious effects: The ABA’s proposed actions will cause a chilling effect on a lawyer’s right to commercial free speech, first established in In Bates v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:30 am
As we try and flush out some of the issues involved in this effort by the ABA, recall that a lawyer’s right to engage in commercial free speech and the community’s right to have that information available to them, is established in the United States Supreme Court a case of Bates v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 1:17 am
The FCO also referred to another prisoner voting case, Frodl v Austria (see my post), which “in the Government’s view, is inconsistent with Hirst”. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 4:04 pm
Judgment of £40,000 (for a BBC story about the case see here) Tierney v News Group Newspapers Ltd Christopher Clarke J and a Jury. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am
Similarly, in 1862, Attorney General Bates wrote to President Lincoln that “If the question were new, and now, for the first time, to be considered, I might have serious doubts” about the “exist[]” interpretation. 10 Op. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
On 14 March 2012, Tugendhat J handed down judgment in Citation PLC v Ellis Whittam Ltd, ([2012] EWHC 549 (QB)) On 15 March 2012 Tugendhat J gave judgment in Weston v Bates ([2012] EWHC 590 (QB)) Events 19 March 2012, 6pm: The Data Protection Act 1998 and Personal Privacy, Philip Coppel QC, Organised by the Statute Law Society with the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
(Mrs Laura McQueen v Daily Record, Clause 5, 24/05/2012). [read post]
