Search for: "Bates v. State Bar of Arizona" Results 1 - 20 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2017, 2:15 am by Derek Handova
In the golden age of attorneys before the 1977 Bates v State Bar of Arizona Supreme Court decision made lawyer advertising legal, practice marketing comprised word of mouth, actual social networking and other first person methods. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 8:32 am by azatty
“The state that begat lawyer advertising (remember Bates v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 6:30 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Since the Supreme Court found in 1977 in Bates v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 12:33 pm by Micah
The Law Firm Marketing Strategies Conference commemorates the 30th anniversary of Bates v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:55 am by Orin Kerr
State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (1977) (lawyer advertising); Virginia State Bd. of Pharmacy. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:22 am
The first of these was Bates & O'Steen v. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 1:29 pm
I am opposed to the proposed rules on three grounds  --  a misunderstanding of the concept of ethics (see Bates et. al. v State Bar of Arizona); the rules themselves will not likely be upheld at the first legal challenge to them; and there is clearly a misunderstanding of the meaning of marketing for lawyers and the long-term effects of Bates in serving both law firms and, most significantly, clients. [read post]