Search for: "Bates v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2021, 12:20 am by Robin Stewart
Case preview: Rakusen v Jepson – Rent Repayment Orders (RROs) and superior landlords in the Court of Appeal Next month the Court of Appeal will hear an appeal from a landlord in a rent repayment order case, Rakusen v Jepson. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Mar. 11, 2020), the Appellate Division of the Yolo County Superior Court reversed an unlawful detainer judgment. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:15 am by 1 Crown Office Row
But in this connection, let us turn to the case of Hirst v United Kingdom No2 (the prisoner voting case). [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 12:20 am by Robin
Case preview: Rakusen v Jepson – Rent Repayment Orders (RROs) and superior landlords in the Court of Appeal Next month the Court of Appeal will hear an appeal from a landlord in a rent repayment order case, Rakusen v Jepson. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:56 pm by nflatow
Some legislation has even been so mean-spirited as to advocate a repeal of 1982’s  Plyler v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
A little more than a year ago, back in February 2008, a majority of the Supreme Court stated, in Riegel v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 6:59 am by Steve Vladeck
The Supreme Court has decided exactly one case involving the privilege, and even that decision—in the Watergate tapes case, United States v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 9:56 am by Steve Worrall
Grubbs, Judge, Superior Court, Cobb Judicial Circuit, Marietta, James C. [read post]
25 May 2010, 9:56 am by Steve Worrall
Grubbs, Judge, Superior Court, Cobb Judicial Circuit, Marietta, James C. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:01 pm by Bexis
Lexis 1688, at *21), the court let a number of warning-related claims survive preemption under PLIVA v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 6:01 am by Giles Peaker
The superior landlord appealed to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
23 May 2008, 6:31 pm
Stephen Schuster of the Superior Court of Cobb County in Marietta, Georgia, and lawyers David Givelber and Nancy Lawler, both of Cohen, Pollock, Merlin & Small in Atlanta, took the audience through the esoteric but increasingly more important topic of challenging expert witnesses under the Daubert rule (named after one of the litigants in the case of Daubert v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:19 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Intervening in Scoppola v Italy No. 3, Grieve made a further statement indicative of this plan for reform of the Court. [read post]