Search for: "Bates v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2012, 11:28 am by Wells C. Bennett
Yesterday, Judge John Bates of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted the government’s motion for summary judgment in the case of Kadi v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:00 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
The petitioner challenges the sufficiency of the government’s evidence on several key issues, including whether Hezb-i-Islami Gulbuddin, the organization to which Judge Bates found Khan to have belonged, was an “associated force engaged in hostilities with the United States and its coalition partners” at the time of Khan’s capture in November 2002. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 7:52 am by Larkin Reynolds
Yesterday the public version of the government’s response brief in Khan v. [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 12:06 pm by Ruthann Robson
Trump, United States District Judge for the District of Columbia John Bates reaffirmed his earlier decision that the Presidential Order rescinding the... [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 8:57 am by Ruthann Robson
Trump, United States District Judge for the District of Columbia, Judge John Bates "vacated" the Department of Homeland Security's... [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 6:10 am by Larkin Reynolds
As Ben noted last month, Judge Bates recently has shown some interest in possibly moving the Boumediene-at-Bagram case, Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:42 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Hirst v United Kingdom (No2), the ‘original’ prisoner voting case from 2005, was ruled upon first by a Chamber, and then successfully referred to the Grand Chamber, by the United Kingdom, using the procedures described above. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:02 am
In the beginning...or 1977, law firm marketing in the United States was born with the Supreme Court decision in the case of Bates v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:43 am by Raffaela Wakeman
The district court found that Khan was “part of” Hezb-i Islami Gulbuddin (HIG), an associated force of al Qaeda and the Taliban engaged in hostilities against the United States and its coalition partners. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:12 pm by Steve Vladeck
The United States was therefore answerable to its Allies for all activities occurring there. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 9:21 pm
The Vermont Supreme Court affirmed, and Wyeth petitioned the United States Supreme Court for certiorari. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 9:41 am by Ed Bates, University of Southampton
It may well have been that differences of opinion on that debate lay behind the majority and minority opinions in Hirst v United Kingdom back in 2005. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
" in the same paragraph in Westlaw produced 16 hits just in the United States Supreme Court - as recent as Watters v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
”   Seasoned attorneys—or those who were practicing law before the United States Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Bates v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:05 am by Ed Bates, University of Southampton
Fine, although the draft Declaration states that, against that background, “the role of the Court is to [merely?] [read post]