Search for: "Battista v. Clarke" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2011, 7:19 am by Ted Frank
Because Battista breaks prison rules regularly, he could not be put in a different facility. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 1:10 pm
The judge found that the Respondent was a "perfectly clear" successor within the meaning of NLRB v. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
(Chairman Battista and Members Schaumber and Walsh participated.) [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 4:04 pm
  See Connell Construction Co. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 10:22 am
"  Ross Stores, Inc. v. [read post]