Search for: "Battle v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 3,838
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2012, 1:19 am by Mike Hanzel
LTC Kageleiry asked the Court to apply the “Toth Doctrine” (United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 10:40 am by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
Their lawsuit started an 11-year legal battle culminating in Chief Justice Taney reading the most abhorrent decision ever issued by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:58 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
This is a birth injury claim against Defendants Calvert Memorial Hospital of Calvert County, that hospital’s emergency room and emergency room doctor, and the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 8:00 am by NCC Staff
  The 53-State Solution By Simon Barnicle, Writer and Attorney Simon Barnicle writes that adding new Democratic states could help bring the United States closer to majority-rule, and could increase pressure to add constitutional amendments to counteract current minority-rule constitutional provisions, like the Electoral College and the equal representation of senators. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 12:52 pm by NCC Staff
Thuraissigiam—a case about constitutional protections against expedited removal of immigrants unlawfully present in the United States—used xenophobic logic and endangers some immigrants, subjecting them to an administration’s whims. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:46 am by SHG
There is, and always has been, a basic question at stake in this battle, and one that will have vast implications for the future, perhaps the most important question that can possibly be asked about the future of privacy. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:53 pm by landuseprof
By way of background, the case, United States ex rel Anti-Discrimination Center of Metro New York, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:33 pm by azatty
In fact, they got to go to the big show—as a defendant at the United States Supreme Court (Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:10 pm by NCC Staff
United States (1993), The Federalist Papers, and a Justice Department memo prove that not allowing witnesses in an impeachment trial would be unconstitutional. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am by NCC Staff
Below is a round-up of the latest from the Battle for the Constitution: a special project on the constitutional debates in American life, in partnership with The Atlantic. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 12:30 pm by EEM
What We Know and What It Means," Journal on Migration and Human Security, vol. 5, no. 2 (2017) [open access]Polling Shows Australians Don’t Trust Trump on Refugee Swap (The Australia Institute, May 2017) [text]"Refugees and Asylees in the United States," Migration Information Source, 7 June 2017 [text]Statement on Secretary Tillerson’s Defense of Massive Cuts in Humanitarian Aid (Refugees International, June 2017) [text]- See also related Politico comment… [read post]