Search for: "Baxter v. AT & T COMMUNICATIONS" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2006, 1:29 am
Baxter and Abbott battle over research dataAnother round in the battle of Baxter Healthcare Corporation and another v Abbott Laboratories and another has been fought out in the Patents Court for England and Wales, before Mr Justice Pumfrey who gave his ruling on Monday. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 10:46 am
Brian Baxter of American Lawyer has a post on lawjobs.com called The Fine Art Of Overbilling. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am by Steven G. Pearl
I normally don't like to quote opinions at great length, but the introduction to this opinion does an excellent job of setting forth the legal background and holding: In Westlake Community Hosp. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am by Bexis
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 235 F.3d 1307, 1317 (11th Cir. 2000) (“reaffirming” prior decision concerning warnings and punitive damages); Richards v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 6:07 am
Baxter Healthcare Corp., 428 Mass. 1, 696 N.E.2d 909, 921 (Mass. 1998); Adams v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
Fortenberry held:The adequacy of a warning addressed to the medical community may fall into the category of issues requiring expert testimony. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 Most warnings concern a product’s use – that if you use (or don’t use) the product in a certain way, you are likely to get hurt; and if you follow the warning, you won’t. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:42 am
 Don’t forget the Union dinner on 4 December 2014 where Charlotte May QC will be reflecting on, in appropriately Christmassy fashion, on IP past, present and future. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
The first film has Baxter, Ron’s dog (Jack Black boots him off a bridge) along with a panda and several Kodiak bears. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Aug. 13, 2009) (“[i]t remains Plaintiff’s burden to prove that defendant’s failure to warn was a pro [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm by Schachtman
Although some of Greenland’s arguments against the use of significance probability may be overstated, his corrections to the misstatements and misunderstandings of significance probability should command greater attention in the legal community. [read post]