Search for: "Baxter v. Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 91
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
Every year after Labor Day, I take a step back to survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and insurance. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm by Noble McIntyre
Dose IQ Software Version 9.0.x has been recalled by Baxter Healthcare because of software defects. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
[This is a version of a letter I sent to the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property today to call attention to various discrepancies in the proposed witness list, especially the presence of the Pirate Party at a hearing at the world’s greatest deliberative body. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:05 am by Walter Olson
[Eric Baxter on Ricks v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Copylaw
Libel in Fiction Q: My main character is loosely based on a real person. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Libel in Fiction Q: My main character is loosely based on a real person. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Libel in Fiction Q: My main character is loosely based on a real person. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Copylaw
Libel in Fiction Q: My main character is loosely based on a real person. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Emerson defendants and the Greenberg Traurig defendants established that this action was without any reasonable basis in law or fact and that the primary purpose in commencing this action was to harass them (see Baxter v Javier, 109 AD3d 493, 495; Zysk v Kaufman, Borgeest & Ryan, LLP, 53 AD3d 482, 483; Nyitray v New York Athletic Club in City of N.Y., 274 AD2d 326, 327; Matter of Entertainment Partners Group v Davis, 198 AD2d 63,… [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:30 am by Will Baude
Fred Smith and Aaron Tang, as well as Erwin Chemerinsky and Catherine Fisk, wrote skeptical responses. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973) (upholding criminalization of obscenity); Smith v. [read post]