Search for: "Baycol Cases I and II" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Last Thursday, February 18, 2010, the Supreme Court granted review in Baycol Cases I and II, no. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The Supreme Court's notice of forthcoming filings from last Friday advises us that the opinion in Baycol Cases I and II, no. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 1:37 am
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., supra, 68 Cal.App.4th at p. 459.)In re Baycol Cases I & II, 2009 Cal. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:40 pm by Steven G. Pearl
In re Baycol Cases I and II (2/28/11) --- Cal.4th ----, 2011 WL 682378, clarifies issues regarding the “death knell” doctrine in class actions. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:50 am by Genevieve P. Rapadas
The California Supreme Court has issued its decision in Baycol Cases I and II concerning the “death knell doctrine. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 12:48 pm
(In re Baycol Cases I & II(2011) 51 Cal.4th 751, 756; Aixtron, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:24 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Supreme Court granted review in Baycol Cases I and II to consider the following issue: Did the "death knell doctrine" require plaintiff to immediately appeal the sustaining of a demurer as to class claims when the ruling resolved both individual and class claims, or did the one final judgment rule apply and require a single appeal from the subsequent entry of final judgment on all claims? [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 10:10 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  Three non-criminal cases have been set, including one of particular interest: Baycol Cases I and II, no. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 2:58 pm
For some reason, the District of Minnesota is the busiest district for MDL cases with 9 active cases currently pending, including Baycol, Levaquin and Medtronic-Fidelis. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:31 pm by David Ettinger
In re Baycol Cases I and II:  Did the “death knell doctrine” require plaintiff to immediately appeal the sustaining of a demurer as to class claims when the ruling resolved both individual and class claims, or did the one final judgment rule apply and require a single appeal from the subsequent entry of final judgment on all claims? [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 11:01 am
The Supreme Court explains today in In re Baycol Cases I and II: "The right to appeal in California is generally governed by the 'one final judgment' rule, under which most interlocutory orders are not appealable. [read post]