Search for: "Bayer Healthcare, AG" Results 61 - 80 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
  * Bayer feels the pain: branded Naproxen can't invoke the territoriality principleKatfriend Marty Schwimmer reports on Belmora LLC v Bayer Consumer Care AG and Bayer Healthcare LLC, 1:14-cv-00847-GBL (EDVA Feb. 6, 2015), a recent US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia ruling that deals with Article 6bis of the Paris Convention in the US as it applies to Bayer’s trade mark ‘FLANAX’. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
  Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –-Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on Intellectual Property in Europe reviewed | Italian baked goods’ trade… [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –- Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on Intellectual Property in Europe reviewed | Italian baked goods’ trade marks… [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
 Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –-Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on Intellectual Property in… [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, No. 5:14-cv-00101, 2015 U.S. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:30 pm by Tom Lamb
In the "Conclusion" section this FDA Beyaz Safety Review makes clear this point: The [epidemiologic studies done to date] demonstrated clearly that the drospirenone-containing contraceptives have had substantial use by women 10 to 24 years of age and the relative risk of VTE appeared higher for women younger than 30 years of age. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 6:36 am by Holly Hayes
Of respondents age 55 and older, 60.5% said they’ve been sued once and 39.2% had been sued at least twice. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 8:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Bayer AG Weddle, former college football player/San Diego Chargers player. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 12:06 am by Kelly
(Patent Docs) Levitra (Vardenafil) – US: Patent infringement complaint following a Paragraph IV certification: Bayer Schering Pharma AG et al. v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:46 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 7,728,011 entitled DERMALLY APPLICABLE LIQUID FORMULATIONS FOR CONTROLLING PARASITIC INSECTS ON ANIMALS and owned by Bayer Healthcare. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:46 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 7,728,011 entitled DERMALLY APPLICABLE LIQUID FORMULATIONS FOR CONTROLLING PARASITIC INSECTS ON ANIMALS and owned by Bayer Healthcare. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 6:09 am by Ed Wallis
Manufactured by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mirena is an IUD device [intrauterine device] that must be inserted by a trained health care provider and is intended to provide contraceptive protection for up to five years. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 12:18 am by Marie Louise
Chiron Healthcare & Novartis (EPLAW) India firm on ‘NO’ to data exclusivity (SiNApSE) (Generic Pharmaceuticals and IP) (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) US: CAFC hears oral arguments on patentability of DNA claims: American Molecular Pathology, et. al, v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 11:15 am by Ed Wallis
Manufactured by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mirena is an IUD device [intrauterine device] that must be inserted by a trained health care provider and is intended to provide contraceptive protection for up to five years. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 11:31 am
Philadelphia Co. 2005) (plaintiff “failed to state a prima facie case”; plaintiff “offers absolutely no evidence, either testimonial or documentary, regarding [the prescriber’s]  prescribing of [the drug] for her” and “merely assumes that [the prescriber] is dead, based on his age at the time he prescribed”); Leffler v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 10:39 am
Bayer AG, 735 N.W.2d 448, 467-68 (Wis. 2007) (drug approvals and possibly other FDA documents); Horne v. [read post]