Search for: "Bays v. Bays" Results 1 - 20 of 5,305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2014, 6:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Oklahoma Supplemental Brief re Bay Mills Tribal Supplemental Brief re Bay Mills The Tenth Circuit previously abated this matter pending the outcome in Michigan v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 6:36 am by Kate Fort
Relevant documents: Michigan v Bay Mills Cert Petition w Appendices Bay Mills Cert Opp Michigan Cert Stage Reply OSG Brief (Recommending Denial) [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 9:14 am by WIMS
  Drakes Bay challenges the Secretary of the Interior's discretionary decision to let Drakes Bay's permit for commercial oyster farming expire according to its terms. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:12 am by Daily Record Staff
Torts — Notice of defect — Res ipsa loquitor Anita Smith appeals from the grant of summary judgment by the Circuit Court of Baltimore County on July 31, 2019, in favor of appellee Bay Front, LLC (“Bay Front”). [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 1:46 pm by Richard M. Re
Instead, I'm talking about last week's decision in Michigan v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 10:30 am by Tom Goldstein
Late last Friday night, the Supreme Court granted an application for an injunction in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 7:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are the briefs: Michigan v Bay Mills Cert Petition w Appendices Bay Mills Cert Opp Michigan Cert Stage Reply United States Invitation Brief Michigan Supplemental Brief [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 11:36 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Titled A Tradition of Sovereignty: Examining Tribal Sovereign Immunity in Bay Mills Indian Community v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:37 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Ian Record: Will the Supreme Court Use Bay Mills Case to Blow Up Tribal Sovereignty? [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 7:21 am by Kate Fort
We did get Justice Ginsberg’s opinion (EPA v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:26 am
It is Beauty Bay and Dotcom Retail v Benefit Cosmetics [2019] EWHC 1150 (Ch).In a nutshell, the court ruled that use of the sign BEAUTY & THE BAY by Benefit would not infringe the BEAUTY BAY trade marks owned by Beauty Bay, and would not amount to passing off.BackgroundBeauty Bay (the claimant, acting together with its licensor) is the registered owner of a number of UK and EU marks. [read post]