Search for: "Bear Cloud v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 208
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2024, 4:58 am
On January 14, 2022, Kakar sued Octo for defamation in Virginia state court based on the issuance of the termination notice. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 11:28 am
Regulation platforms build solidarity among States. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:01 pm
It remains to be seen what the Copyright Office will recommend to Congress and how it will affect the progression or resolution of these cases, as well as who will bear the potential burdens of infringement liability. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
Cloud (2015), R. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:57 am
Cloud (2015), R. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:20 am
If we cannot bear the thought of states reaching inconsistent applications of federal law, perhaps the Court should overturn Testa v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:00 pm
It's a prosecutor-v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
When it approved the CAT, the Commission stated that plan participants could “recoup their regulatory costs . . . through the collection of fees from their members, as long as such fees are reasonable, equitably allocated, and not unfairly discriminatory. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:24 am
To illustrate, in Shore v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Karen Bradshaw & Monika Ehrman, Cloud Seeding, Wildfire Smoke Emissions, and Solar Geoengineering: Why is Climate Modification Unregulated? [read post]
4 May 2023, 2:31 pm
Mondelez International v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
“Stewards” of personal data should expect demanding requirements but with the hope for a federal standard that could lead to greater harmonization of the existing state-by-state patchwork. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
In Dart v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
The issue is further clouded by the fact that some analysts—wrongly, in my view—have increasingly called into question the military effectiveness of, in their opinion, outdated naval warfare methods such as blockades. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:37 pm
” Third, the DOD and the intelligence community “commit[s] to bringing to bear their full range of complementary authorities to disruption campaigns. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 6:31 am
Georg Werner) has meanwhile published (on a website run by the Bavarian state government) two Nokia v. [read post]
