Search for: "Bear Cloud v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2023, 1:00 pm
It's a prosecutor-v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
When it approved the CAT, the Commission stated that plan participants could “recoup their regulatory costs . . . through the collection of fees from their members, as long as such fees are reasonable, equitably allocated, and not unfairly discriminatory. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:24 am
To illustrate, in Shore v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Karen Bradshaw & Monika Ehrman, Cloud Seeding, Wildfire Smoke Emissions, and Solar Geoengineering: Why is Climate Modification Unregulated? [read post]
4 May 2023, 2:31 pm
Mondelez International v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
“Stewards” of personal data should expect demanding requirements but with the hope for a federal standard that could lead to greater harmonization of the existing state-by-state patchwork. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
In Dart v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
The issue is further clouded by the fact that some analysts—wrongly, in my view—have increasingly called into question the military effectiveness of, in their opinion, outdated naval warfare methods such as blockades. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:37 pm
” Third, the DOD and the intelligence community “commit[s] to bringing to bear their full range of complementary authorities to disruption campaigns. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 6:31 am
Georg Werner) has meanwhile published (on a website run by the Bavarian state government) two Nokia v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:19 am
Finally, it bears noting that the few courts that have addressed MUTSA preemption have interpreted that issue narrowly. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 5:16 am
V. 51, no. 6 (2001), pp. 48–53. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 7:52 am
” Enforcement Under the CRA, market surveillance authorities (MSAs), to be designated or created in each EU Member State, have the primary responsibility for enforcement, including through coordinated sweeps of IoT products made available in the EU. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
While not directly comparable, this is similar to the position affirmed by the Court in Gillette v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
U.S. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:58 am
The evacuation will be carried out by trains and by buses, and those who refuse to evacuate will have to sign “a certain form of refusal from mandatory evacuation” stating they understand and are aware of all the consequences of staying in the combat zones and bear personal responsibility for their lives, Vereshchuk added. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 11:20 pm
For now, it's important to bear in mind that a market investigation gives the CMA fundamentally more wiggle room than a unilateral-conduct investigation. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 5:05 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 11:33 am
And now he and his country will bear the consequences. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
The case of Epic Games v. [read post]
