Search for: "Beard v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 242
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2012, 11:47 am by Howard Friedman
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, (3rd Cir., July 30, 2012), the 3rd Circuit affirmed a  Pennsylvania federal district court's opinion dismissing an inmate's complaint that he was denied access to plants, herbs, crystals, tarot cards, runes, spices, and an altar cloth in his cell to practice his Wiccan religion, and that he was not permitted to grow his hair or beard and was denied a religious adviser.In United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Yesterday, the Court heard arguments in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:59 am
California, 547 U.S. 843, 850 (2006), the United States Supreme Court held that: [P]arolees are on the "continuum" of state-imposed punishments. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 1:04 pm by Howard Friedman
Plaintiff's complaint covers religious living units, diet, and religious dress, items and prayer.In Stevens v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 4:37 pm
The 6th Circuit still leaves the courts looking into the minds of religionists and assessing the religiosity of their motivations, when it would be better to be "done with this business of judicially examining other people's faiths" (to quote the last line of my all-time favorite judicial opinion, Justice Jackson dissenting in United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Glen C. Hansen
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:35 am by Kent Scheidegger
Finally, it appears that the United States Supreme Court is prepared to clean up one of the messier areas of its jurisprudence, the question of when a state procedural default rule is an "adequate" ground for decision, precluding federal review of the underlying question. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Calo, Constructing the Secular: Law and Religion Jurisprudence in Europe and the United States (September 2014).Adam Lamparello, 'God Hates Fags' Is Not the Same as 'Fuck the Draft': Introducing the Non-Sexual Obscenity Doctrine, (October 8, 2014).Nadia B. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
There was a lot of action at the United States Supreme Court this week. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:03 am by Steve Hall
Beard is availble in Adobe .pdf format. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:20 am by Maxwell Kennerly
What would the Justices of the United States Supreme Court advised had they have been on those teams? [read post]