Search for: "Beaty v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2023, 8:08 am
The workshop reports: “Approximately 4 million pregnant people in the United States give birth annually, and 70 percent of these individuals take at least one prescription medication during their pregnancy. [read post]
28 May 2023, 5:06 am
In August 2021, Dos Santos left Brazil with Y.F.G. and traveled to the United States without Silva’s consent. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:01 am
In Dixon v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 8:52 am
Leslie had since May 2016 wrongfully retained their two minor children, H.M.G. and H.F.G., in the United States and outside Canada, the children’s country of habitual residence. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:48 am
Beaty, 526 F.3d 1340 (11th Cir. 2008); Gomez, 812 F.3d at 1013, 1015. [read post]
Ischiu v Garcia, 2017 WL 3500403 (D. Maryland, 2017)[Guatemala][Grave Risk of Harm][Petition denied]
15 Sep 2017, 9:21 am
Gomez Garcia requested asylum and was paroled into the United States. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:51 am
The matter is before United States District Judge James Beaty in the Middle District, whose latest order is a ruling on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:51 am
The matter is before United States District Judge James Beaty in the Middle District, whose latest order is a ruling on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:01 am
In Seaman v. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 6:07 am
Anne returned to the United States on February 15, 2011. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:04 am
See United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:21 pm
Anne Acosta the Respondent was citizen of the United States. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 10:45 am
The only mention of the legality of possession in the opinion is dictum in a footnote referencing an entirely separate chapter of title 21 of the United States Code, not at issue in the litigation.Third, the order clearly crosses the line drawn by the controlling Supreme Court precedent in Heckler v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 1:41 pm
But we recently read Beaty v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 10:45 am
The case is Beaty v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:30 am
The Memorandum Opinion in Beaty v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:28 am
" That seems pretty clear, since Section 2412 says that it does not "alter[ ], modif[y], repeal[ ], invalidate[ ], or supersede[ ] any other provision of Federal law which authorizes an award of such fees and other expenses to any party other than the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm
The CAAF published a decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 12:39 am
Rives in the case of United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 5:30 am
Haimdas, 720 F.Supp.2d 183,210 (E.D.N.Y.2010) (citing United States v. [read post]
