Search for: "Becker v. Arnold" Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2013, 6:43 am
In relation to Lilly’s contention that claim 1 was obvious over European Patent Application No. 0 613 007 A2 (“Becker”) published on 31 August 1994, Arnold J noted: I shall deal with this very briefly, since in my opinion it is manifest that claim 1 cannot be obvious over Becker if it is not obvious over Konig. [read post]