Search for: "Beer v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 361
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2013, 1:24 pm by Nikki Siesel
You can find guidance, under §1207.01 of the Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (The rules that govern trademark practice at the United States Patent & Trademark Office). [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
Says the IPKat, this application rather reminds him of Rygrange's Application Case O/479/00, an application in bygone times to register the word UNITED as a trade mark for bottled beer and non-alcoholic drinks. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:15 am by Eugene Volokh
The one time it came before for the Court was in Gallagher v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
The one case often pointed to by the “no exemptions for commercial activity” arguments is United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
The homebrewing beer movement started in the United States in the 1970s (Charlie Papazian, The Complete Joy of Homebrewing). [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:00 am by Tim Sitzmann
With the explosion of craft beers in the United States, we can now do the same with our ales and lagers too. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:28 am by Florian Mueller
QE's approach of not teaming up with patent attorneys in these types of proceedings is as unusual as it is controversial in the German IP law community, but in the proceedings I watch there is no indication of them being less effective on their own.All three parties (Apple, Google, Microsoft) also dispatched in-house counsel from the United States, which speaks to the significance of this case.The U.S. equivalent of this patent is still at issue in a Motorola v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:52 am
It particularly refers to the practice of pursuing a case in England and Wales, in preference to other jurisdictions, such as the United States, which provide more extensive defences for those accused of making derogatory statements. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ron Coleman
 ”Because the University of Alabama is a state entity, it cannot be joined in a case in federal court. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:07 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
The Ontario Court of Appeal Clarifies Rules for the Division of Property in Buttar v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:07 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
The Ontario Court of Appeal Clarifies Rules for the Division of Property in Buttar v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:58 am by Michael F. Smith
Given the fundamental question it poses regarding an electorate’s right to amend its own state constitution, Schuette v. [read post]