Search for: "Beer v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2018, 4:05 am
Write a memorandum to PM Trudeau explaining the key issues and how they will likely be resolved.Question 2 Myrontana is a state of the United States, located in the 12th Circuit. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 6:32 am
The long-anticipated trial in the case of Diocese of Quincy, et al. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 10:03 am by Brian A. Hall
Adkins, 395 U.S. 653, 674, 89 S.Ct. 1902, 23 L.Ed.2d 610 (1969); But see, Beer Nuts, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:13 am by Scott Bomboy
Nebraska that two businessmen couldn’t sell beer that had flag labels on the bottles, upholding a state law. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:14 am by Melody McDonald Lanier
Statistics show the imposition of the death penalty has sharply declined in the Lone Star state over the past two decades. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am by Christa Culver
United StatesDocket: 10-18Issue(s): Whether, when a trial judge’s restriction on the cross-examination of a prosecution witness is challenged on appeal as a violation of the Confrontation Clause, the proper standard of review is de novo or abuse of discretion.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of the United States Army Defense Appellate DivisionAmicus brief of the National… [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Milwaukeeans had to wait until December 12 to learn that the United States Supreme Court had denied the state’s petition for certiorari. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
The Permanent Mission of India to the United NationsDocket: 10-627Issue(s): 1) Whether, in determining whether Congress authorized the Secretary of State ("Secretary") to preempt traditional state taxing powers by designating certain exemptions from state and local property tax laws under The Foreign Missions Act, 22 U.S.C. §§ 4301 et seq. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:06 pm by Patricia Hughes
I briefly referred to the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Comeau, which considered the constitutionality of barriers to interprovincial trade represented by section 134 of the New Brunswick Liquor Control Act limitations on the amount of liquor and beer that someone could bring into New Brunswick from another province. [read post]