Search for: "Beer v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 519
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
; * A clear vision of genuine use: Specsavers v Asda (again); * Chemists and mech/elecs unite! [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 5:38 pm
Second, it adds to the already long and impressive string of victories by same-sex marriage advocates in numerous court decisions since the Supreme Court issued United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 10:25 am by Scott Hervey
  JEW filed a complaint for declaratory relief in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, requesting the court to declare that the above mark does not infringe or dilute any of the DUKE trademarks owned by Duke University. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am by The Book Review Editor
It was Arzú who had just persuaded the United Nations to take Guatemala off its blacklist. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:54 am
View4488334 K-TEA View4488288 VERSAHAUL View4488132 INDY PARTNERSHIP View4488060 SAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODS COLLEGE INDIANA S M W C EST. 1840 View4487991 OAK MOTORS View4487901 H&H TRAILERS WWW.HHTRAILERS.COM View4485290 EXALT View4485259 S M W View4485030 KIDSOFT View4484916 LIPGARB View4484902 SAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODS COLLEGE View4484831 BAZBEAUX View4484807 SAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODS COLLEGE INDIANA VIRTUS CUM SCIENTIA View4484785 HYDRO-CUSHION View4482833 View4481224 … [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm by John Elwood
Holder, 13-471, involves a couple who fled the land of beer and bratwurst (no, not that one) after being fined and threatened with prison for home-schooling their children. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:03 pm by Ilya Shapiro
Since then, the company has grown into a leader in the arts-and-crafts retail industry, with 588 stores and around 13,000 employees across the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
  Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 5:55 am by admin
… As the United States correctly observes, the regulation “reflect[s] the agency’s balance of competing considerations in a specific setting that could easily be upset by the intrusion of a general private remedy such as that provided under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:24 pm by Nikki Siesel
You can find guidance, under §1207.01 of the Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (The rules that govern trademark practice at the United States Patent & Trademark Office). [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
Says the IPKat, this application rather reminds him of Rygrange's Application Case O/479/00, an application in bygone times to register the word UNITED as a trade mark for bottled beer and non-alcoholic drinks. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:15 am by Eugene Volokh
The one time it came before for the Court was in Gallagher v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
The one case often pointed to by the “no exemptions for commercial activity” arguments is United States v. [read post]