Search for: "Beer v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 361
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2013, 10:36 pm by Steve Baird
With more than 26,000 Subway locations throughout the United States, and all the advertising done on the local and national level for the largest restaurant chain in the world, I shutter to think how many errant TM symbols are swinging in the wind, must be millions upon millions. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 3:29 pm by Kevin
United States (the internment case), on the grounds that the government knowingly submitted false information to the court in 1944. [read post]
13 May 2013, 8:08 pm by Ron Coleman
Unfortunately, the consensus of United States legal authority on what is generic rather than descriptive, and vice-versa, has become somewhat discordant. . . . [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:00 am by Administrator
University of Alberta Faculty of Law BlogThe right to silence In the United States, and to a similar extent in Canada, the right to silence is sacred. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 9:45 am by John W. Arden
The Justice Department had contended that the $20.1 billion transaction would substantially lessen competition in the market for beer in the United States as a whole and in 26 metropolitan areas across the United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 6:32 am
The long-anticipated trial in the case of Diocese of Quincy, et al. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 7:51 am by Heidi Meinzer
The United States Supreme Court handily sided with Aldo, ruling unanimously that K9 officers had no such duty to maintain field performance history and records of purported “false positives. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 7:51 am by Heidi Meinzer
The United States Supreme Court handily sided with Aldo, ruling unanimously that K9 officers had no duty to maintain field performance history and records of purported “false positives. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Leon Friedman
  His persistence would change the face of criminal justice in the United States. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
  Travelling around in cyberspace, and covering as much ground as Kingsley, is Katfriend Miri Frankel who, having only just penned a guest post for PatLit on the SHIELD anti-troll draft bill in the United States, popped up in quite a different area of IP with "Sherlock Holmes and the Case of the Copyright Expiration Date", here. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 11:00 am by Ron Coleman
On Valentine’s Day, appropriately enough perhaps, Tiffany (the jeweler, not the singer) filed a complaint against Costco in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, asserting a variety of trademark-related causes of action. [read post]