Search for: "Beer v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 363
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2013, 10:36 pm by Steve Baird
With more than 26,000 Subway locations throughout the United States, and all the advertising done on the local and national level for the largest restaurant chain in the world, I shutter to think how many errant TM symbols are swinging in the wind, must be millions upon millions. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 2:29 pm by Marissa Grunes
Her dissertation project explores frontier architecture in 19th century poetry, fiction, and non-fiction of the United States. [read post]
13 May 2013, 8:08 pm by Ron Coleman
Unfortunately, the consensus of United States legal authority on what is generic rather than descriptive, and vice-versa, has become somewhat discordant. . . . [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 4:17 am by SHG
The Supreme Court held in Davis v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 9:53 pm
Summary of Notifiable Diseases—United States, 2007. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:10 am
Henley’s name in a transformative nature invoking the protection of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution” and that “the advertisement is obviously a joke. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 6:56 am by Michael M. O'Hear
United States, 483 U.S. 107 (1987), in which the Supreme Court decided that a trial judge properly disregarded evidence from two jurors that several of their fellows had been drinking alcohol and consuming drugs throughout the trial. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term Commencing March 4, 1877 1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 3:51 am by SHG
Ct. 1683, 1689 n.2 (2020); see also United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
Clip: Krusty wins the Election “I swear to uphold and protect the Constitution of these United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
It is very rarely permitted, since the American system of justice is premised upon an open system in which, whenever one side wants to communicate with the Court, it has to give prior notice to the other side, so that they too will have an opportunity to be heard.).The "ex parte" order would give the RIAA permission to take "immediate discovery" -- before the defendants have been served or given notice -- which authorizes the issuance of subpoenas to the ISP's asking for the… [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:23 am
Supreme Court decisions will likely impact companies' drafting of arbitration provisionsDiaz ReusTwo recent United States Supreme Court decisions present significant new developments on the scope and interpretation of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C. [read post]