Search for: "Beer v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 468
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2023, 3:59 pm
The United States proposed a broad product market including all shoes. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 10:15 am
Four years after a plurality of the United States Supreme Court in Mitchell v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:00 am
Industria De Alimentos Zenu S.A.S. v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
Beer Institute, 491 U. [read post]
22 May 2023, 11:59 am
McKay v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 11:24 am
Warren v. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 3:47 pm
From People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 3:30 am
See, e.g., Signal Cos. v. [read post]
Myong Nam Kim v. Board of Liquor License Commissioners for Baltimore City (Md. Ct. of Spec. Appeals)
3 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
Filed: June 29, 2022Holding: A Maryland statute that allowed certain beer, wine, and liquor license holders in a certain area of a legislative district to exchange their licenses for other licenses under certain circumstances and restricted the hours of operation for certain licensees in a separate area of the same legislative district did not violate the one subject requirement in Article III, § 29 of the Maryland Constitution and was not shown to violate equal… [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
United States. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 4:16 am
D & P Holding S.A.. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
Beer Institute, Inc.[17] involved a Connecticut statute that required out-of-state beer shippers to affirm that prices posted for products sold to Connecticut wholesalers were, in the relevant period, no higher than prices in bordering states.[18] The Court invalidated these price affirmation schemes on the narrow grounds that they had the "practical effect of controlling . [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 1:02 pm
The latter was true in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 2:26 am
Jet Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 7:45 am
Case date: 01 June 2022 Case number: No 21-1107 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:11 am
In brief: What the statistical analyses actually show is that (A) the odds of obtaining the reported results in any of the four states if the 2020 voting population had precisely the same Dem. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 3:28 am
The more interesting part of the decision concerns the plaintiffs’ direct, contract claim alleging that the issuance of the treasury shares without payment violated the operating agreement’s provision stating that the Class C treasury units “will only be issued as Class C Units, unless purchased/assigned to Class A Member(s). [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 3:21 pm
See Beers v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:23 am
SCOTUS April 2015 LGBTQ 54663, Arguments at the United States Supreme Court for Same-Sex Marriage on April 28, 2015. [read post]
