Search for: "Beer v. United States"
Results 421 - 440
of 462
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2008, 4:00 am
Canadian Robert V. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 10:48 am
United States, 250 U.S. 616 (1919). [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:32 am
Opinion below (Supreme Court of North Carolina) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of the Honorable Vernon Sykes and Honorable Roger Corbin (in support of the petitioner) Amicus brief of the League of Women Voters of the United States (in support of the petitioner) Amicus brief of Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, and Ohio (in support of the petitioner) Amicus brief of the NAACP, Cindy Moore, Milford Farrior, and Mary Jordan (in support of the petitioner) … [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 3:17 pm
Background of trademark law Passed by Congress in 1946, the Lanham Act is the source of all Federal trademark law in the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 11:46 pm
De Beers also agreed to injunctive relief requiring it to "comply with and abide by the antitrust laws of the United States . . . , as well as with the antitrust laws of each of the several states. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 6:04 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 10:00 pm
, (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (more from Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Washington State Patent Law Blog), (Harold Wegner), Global101 reasons for not selling your unused trade marks: (IPKat),ICANN to battle domain name tasting: (Trademark Blog), (related coverage from Trademark Blog),Is a patent a monopoly? [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 6:09 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 11:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 4:40 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 5:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:43 pm
Rich Kopf United States District Judge [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
State of California (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1108; see People v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:43 am
Since the venerable case of Ace Beer Distributors v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Appellant described the collision, stating that he had consumed a 12-pack of beer between 7:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 5:16 am
The Branch Consultants v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:50 am
Julie Cohen: Coded v. tacit - not quite clear on the distinctions. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 4:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 1:54 am
In the lawsuit, today was the day set by federal Judge Peter Beer requesting the United States Attorney's Office to intervene in the lawsuit, or face a July 11 show cause hearing explaining why not. [read post]
