Search for: "Bell v. Board of Supervisors (1994)"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
Upon discovery of the Laursen’s theft, two of Laursen’s clients filed a FINRA arbitration action against Laursen, Hantz and Laursen’s supervisor. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
The consultant affirmed the suitability of a class 23 exemption, and in May, the Board approved the exemption and the sheriff’s request. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
The consultant affirmed the suitability of a class 23 exemption, and in May, the Board approved the exemption and the sheriff’s request. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
One permit was for the San Fernando spineflower, and the other permit was a multispecies permit for the western yellow-billed cuckoo, the southwestern willow flycatcher and the least Bell’s vireo, combined. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
The Board also noted that in Penrod v. [read post]
