Search for: "Bennett v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 1,063
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2019, 10:37 am by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenesisolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear four years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 6:11 pm
  It concerns, according to Judge Gould, a class action brought by a couple of teachers who ask for a "return [of] interest that was allegedly skimmed from their state-managed retirement accounts. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:10 am by Dennis Crouch
Bennett Regulator Guards, Inc., No. 18-999 (same) Superior Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:57 am
It was standing room only in the courtroom of  US district court judge(and former REGJB ASA and then state court judge) Bob Scola Tuesday morning as AUSA Elizabeth Young rose and addressed the jurors in USA v. [read post]
Charles is the Bennett Boskey Visiting Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Edward and Ellen Schwarzman Professor of Law at Duke Law School. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
TLU v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] EWCA Civ 2217. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am by William Ford
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Davidson v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 11:19 am by Scott Harman
Seamus Hughes and Bennett Clifford detailed how the capture of Soulay Noah Su, a 16-year-old United States citizen ostensibly fighting for the Islamic State in Syria, represents a departure from the norms that apply to most foreign-born ISIS fighters. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In McKinney v Bennett, 31 AD3d 860, the Appellate Division held that the appointing authority was not required to read all 1,228 pages of the hearing transcript and each document submitted, citing Matter of Taub v Pirnie, 3 NY2d 188. [read post]