Search for: "Benton v. Board of Supervisors (1991)" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Court Affirms Use of Substantial Evidence Test in CEQA Challenge to Annual Adjustment in Water Allocation Regulations
8 May 2012, 3:25 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
The trial court denied the petition, determining that Benton v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
First District Applies CEQA’s “Subsequent Review” Rules, Substantial Evidence Standard of Review; Upholds Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration and Modified Master Use Permit for Remote Buddhist Retreat
6 Sep 2016, 11:23 am by Arthur F. Coon
Imperial Irrigation Dist. (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 650, 653; Benton v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2012 CEQA 4th QUARTER REVIEW
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Napa County Board of Supervisors (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 162: The processing of sequential boundary line adjustments is categorically exempt from CEQA, as long as a discretionary permit is not concurrently processed. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
The Plot Thickens: California Supreme Court Vacates Submission Of Just-Argued CEQA Subsequent Review Case, Orders Supplemental Briefing
12 May 2016, 9:59 am by Arthur F. Coon
Board of Supervisors (1991) 226 Cal.App.3d 1467, 1479-1482.) [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2012 CEQA 2nd QUARTER REVIEW
2 Jul 2012, 11:21 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Board of Trustees of the California State University and in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Supreme Court Set To Hear Important CEQA Subsequent Review Case
26 Apr 2016, 1:46 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Board of Supervisors (1991) 226 Cal.App.3d 1467.) [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Second Appellate District Clarifies Test for SEIR Preparation When Project is Modified
5 Sep 2007, 11:10 am
Board of Supervisors (1991) 226 Cal.App.3d 1467 is instructive. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Supreme Court Addresses CEQA Subsequent Review Rules in San Mateo Gardens Case
22 Sep 2016, 4:55 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Lishman (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 1288), or a more deferential “substantial evidence” standard of review (as held by Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com