Search for: "Berger v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2010, 4:12 am
Penalty imposed remanded to appointing authority for reconsideration after court vacates findings of guilt with respect to 2 of 5 disciplinary chargesMatter of Berger v Board of Fire Commissioners of the Jericho Fire District., 2010 NY Slip Op 02138, Decided on March 16, 2010, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Board of Fire Commissioners of the Jericho Fire District a hearing officer finding Michael Berger guilty of five charges of misconduct and, or,… [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:23 am by Bridget Crawford
Superior Court, 450 U.S. 464 (1981) Commentary: Margo Kaplan Judgment: Cynthia Godsoe Chapter 15. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:06 pm by Joseph L. Hyde
The defendant first argued the trial court erred by denying his motion to disqualify superior court judge Thomas H. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Berger v Rokeach  2017 NY Slip Op 27374  Decided on November 20, 2017  Supreme Court, Kings County  Silber, J. answers these questions with a strong degree of specificity. [read post]
21 May 2018, 6:01 am
HomeStreet, Inc., [2] was issued by the Superior Court of the State of Washington for King County. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:10 am by Christopher Tyner
Judges Bryant and Berger concurred in result only, without separate opinions. [read post]
26 May 2020, 1:22 pm by John Rubin
A defendant who disagrees with the jail credit calculated by the trial court should seek relief under the procedures in G.S. 15-196.4 State v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
So held the he Appellate Division, Third Department in its May 11, 2017 decision in Flikweert v. [read post]
23 Oct 2007, 2:15 am
In February -- one month after the patent case in question, Berger v. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 12:28 pm by Orin S. Kerr
The New Jersey Supreme Court also has an important case pending on the meaning of intercept involving review of the Superior Court's decision in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]