Search for: "Berman v. Parker" Results 1 - 20 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2009, 8:18 am by propertyprof
Amy Lavine (Albany Law School) has posted Urban Renewal and the Story of Berman v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 5:22 pm
Amy Lavine, Albany Law School, has posted Urban Renewal and the Story of Berman v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s 1954 decision in Berman v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 10:25 pm by landuseprof
The abstract: The Supreme Court's 1954 decision in Berman v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:56 pm by Alan Ackerman
The amendment could take Missouri back to the pre-Berman v Parker law. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:18 pm by Alan Ackerman
  The underlying issue will remain whether “blight” is to have any real meaning in the context of  Berman v Parker or if blight is just something a local community concludes exists for a property in order to obtain the property via the condemnation process. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:39 am by Alan Ackerman
 But to call property “blighted” in order to more easily acquire the property through the eminent domain process, is not the type of blight that existed in the Berman v Parker, 1948 Supreme Court case. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
“An Innovative Way to Title Property in Poor Countries” [Ian Vasquez on Peter Schaefer and Clay Schaefer Cato study] Berman v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 10:02 am
Alexander Aleinikoff (Georgetown), Hiram Chodosh (Utah), Nora V. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 2:15 pm
Parker, 348 U.S. 26 (1954), which keyed off blight designations. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 4:12 pm
In today's Washington Post, Duke University Professor of Law & Professor of Political Science Erwin Chemerinsky weighs in here on judicial deference and last week's decision in Parker v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:15 am by Ilya Somin
For example, Thomas’ opinion in Kelo would likely require the overruling of Berman v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:03 pm
This is a long, long ways from the need for the taking in Berman v. [read post]