Search for: "Bernstein v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
” The “objective partisan assumption” is that lawyers can make independent ethical evaluations of client behaviour, while also remaining loyal to clients partisan Cognitive biases toward optimism, confirmation of existing beliefs make it much more difficult for lawyers to neutrally assess the behaviour of their own clients The perjury trilemma: lawyers have duties to (1) be competent, (2) preserve client confidences, and (3) be honest in court. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:41 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As I have detailed on this blog (most recently here), due to two Delaware court decisions — the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Corwin v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:41 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As I have detailed on this blog (most recently here), due to two Delaware court decisions — the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Corwin v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 11:18 am by David Bernstein
” Finally, MacLean seems to suggest the economist James Buchanan, the villain of the book, developed his “public choice” ideas in response to Brown v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 7:24 pm by Schachtman
What the Superior Court purport to giveth, the Superior Court taketh away. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:35 am by Eugene Volokh
If Serafinowicz posts anything about Bernstein, he will be in violation of a court order and could be thrown in jail for contempt of court. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On 19 January 2015, Mew J in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice handed down judgment in the libel case of Bernstein v Poon 2015 ONSC 155. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 6:10 pm by Garry Wise
More reading:  Defamation case involving diet doctors 'more about ego than injury' judge finds Bernstein v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
" Delay DamagesIn a case of first impression, the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled in Roth v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
" Delay DamagesIn a case of first impression, the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled in Roth v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The Superior Court affirmed by ruling that the insured was estopped from relitigating the claim as the issue of damages had already been litigated. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
The superiority of judges as fact finders in complex scientific cases remains to be shown. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In Pusl, a three-judge panel of the Superior Court allowed the molding of a third-party verdict downward to reflect the previous UIM settlement secured by a plaintiff for the same accident and thereby prevent a double recovery.After Pusl, the plaintiffs bar switched back to the strategy pursuing the third-party liability claims first for several years until the 2012 decision of the Superior Court came down in Smith v. [read post]