Search for: "Bernstein v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
" Delay DamagesIn a case of first impression, the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled in Roth v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
" Delay DamagesIn a case of first impression, the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled in Roth v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The Superior Court affirmed by ruling that the insured was estopped from relitigating the claim as the issue of damages had already been litigated. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
The superiority of judges as fact finders in complex scientific cases remains to be shown. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In Pusl, a three-judge panel of the Superior Court allowed the molding of a third-party verdict downward to reflect the previous UIM settlement secured by a plaintiff for the same accident and thereby prevent a double recovery.After Pusl, the plaintiffs bar switched back to the strategy pursuing the third-party liability claims first for several years until the 2012 decision of the Superior Court came down in Smith v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 7:43 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The State applied to, or courts of such State, shall decide whether the crime or offense is of a political character. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:33 pm by Maxwell Kennerly
Last year, Judge Mark Bernstein in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas had a long, scholarly analysis of the state of privilege law in the Kolar v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 8:45 pm by David Bernstein
His opinion was eventually overruled by the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments.In contrast, Vinson, a district court judge whose opinion will be reviewed by two superior courts, basically argues that the federal government’s power to “regulate interstate commerce” doesn’t include the power to force people to buy and eat broccoli, a position consistent with President Obama’s declared policy (but not constitutional) perspective during the 2008… [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 8:03 pm by Ray Dowd
   Walter Westfield was a successful Geman art dealer who was expropriated by the Nazis and murdered at Auschwitz.In my post expressed my surprise that the Sixth Circuit did not recognize that U.S. courts were relieved of any restraints on their jurisdiction to unwind evil Nazi acts since the Second Circuit stripped the Nazis of sovereign immunity as of 1954 in the Bernstein v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
I think the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division decision in Kendall v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 4:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In tort, generally a fault rule has been considered morally superior. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 5:06 pm by admin
Most recently, Superior Court Judge Stephen Bernstein reduced the award to the plaintiff attorneys from $6.5 million to $4.3 million. [read post]