Search for: "Best v. State Bar" Results 81 - 100 of 5,308
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2023, 5:56 am by Santiago Stocker
However, an honest assessment about a deeply flawed process that results in observers being denied access in future elections only serves to reveal the true state of democracy in a country. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
  The persons responsible for the Fourteenth Amendment sought to bar from present and future office all persons who betrayed their constitutional oath. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:33 am by Eugene Volokh
I also think the Supreme Court was right in Cohen v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan to make an exception to the rule barring cameras from federal courtrooms for Donald Trump’s election subversion case and permit the televising, recording, or same-day release of video and audio recordings of his trial. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The best precedent for allowing such a collateral challenge is probably United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The federal civil rights statute barring discrimination in public accommodations does not forbid sex discrimination, although many state and local provisions do. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am by John Elwood
The government seeks review in Cargill, which it says provides the best vehicle of the three. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 6:16 am by Jacob Wirz
This is an important question of state law, as deference can allow an agency to win even when its legal position is not the best interpretation of the law.[1] Over the past decade, state legislatures,[2] state courts,[3] and the public[4] have begun to grow wary of the power that deference cedes to state agencies and have started to pare it back. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm by Jeanne Huang
The Australian test, after Voth poses a negative test and a more difficult bar. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:55 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
[added to Ch. 8, § 8.3] (defendant failed to provide sufficient evidence that unexplained fall over a railing causing catastrophic injury was barred by self-harm exemption of Labor Code § 3600(a)(5)) Kuciemba v. [read post]