Search for: "Biddle v. Commissioner"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2020, 12:45 am
The recent case of Timothy Clinton Biddle v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 1:07 pm
Thanks to a grant from the ACTEC Foundation, the Biddle Law Library Archives was able to process the papers of Richard V. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:05 pm
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), such as the recent ruling in Amgen v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:05 pm
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), such as the recent ruling in Amgen v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 9:00 am
” represent a small deviation from past jurisprudence, which simply repeats verbatim the regulatory language before going on to discuss the longstanding doctrine starting with Biddle v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:45 am
Practicing Law Institute – 2013 Igartúa de la Rosa v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 7:48 am
” Meanwhile, Robert Stoll, former Commissioner for Patents at the USPTO and current partner with Drinker Biddle, was not surprised by the decision, but did say that he thinks at least one amendment should be ordinarily granted as a matter of right. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:03 am
Bob Stoll (former Commissioner for Patents at the USPTO, currently at Drinker Biddle) and Stephen Kunin (Oblon Spivak) reflected on the AIA, and a variety of other matters to provide a fairly comprehensive listing of the biggest moments for patents and patent law over the last 12 months. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
Bob Stoll is a partner at Drinker Biddle and Reath and Co-Chair of the IP Group and a previous Commissioner for Patents at the USPTO. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:03 am
Kara Stoll is the sister-in-law of Robert Stoll, a partner at Drinker Biddle and former Commissioner for Patents at the USPTO. [read post]
6 May 2015, 7:09 pm
” The data from California used by Boden, Reville, and Biddle involved workers injured in 1994 and subsequent changes in the PPD benefits in California have probably made the benefits even less adequate. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
In Matter of Coward v Biddle, 2022 WL 17332496 (2d Dept.,2022) the father’s counsel moved, inter alia, to hold the mother in civil contempt for her failure to comply with a prior order of the Family Court which had directed the mother to pay attorneys’ fees directly to the father’s counsel of $3,000. [read post]
