Search for: "Biggers v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 1,910
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2015, 7:19 am
The Necessary and Proper Clause should be interpreted to give states a bigger role in determining when the federal drug laws are constitutional. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:01 pm
But the real budget gap is bigger than the $14.8 billion difference between those numbers, because population growth and inflation means the state must spend more to provide services - particularly for education and healthcare. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:59 am
MINTON v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:59 am
MINTON v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 11:49 am
Schwarzenegger and Plata v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 10:04 am
Shuman (1987).The bigger problem is the 2016 decision in Montgomery v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 4:59 am
Donati v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 2:14 pm
The case is Muhammad Ali Enterprises LLC v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:23 am
For instance, in the 2012 appellate court decision in Corrales v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
They also cite Sosa v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 4:44 am
DC Comics (2003) 30 Cal.4th 881 and Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am
The case The Medicines Company v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 8:13 am
Yes, the Heat and the Spurs will be facing off again on Tuesday, but we've got bigger things in mind. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 10:55 pm
As Justices Thomas and Scalia discuss in their separate dissents in Mitchell v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 9:00 am
Viacom Int’l Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 5:30 am
In Bigger v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 7:44 pm
By Matthew Skurnik Since the Supreme Court’s June 2013 ruling in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 12:56 am
With respect to design patent damages in Apple v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
As we know, under the due process clauses of the New York State Constitution, Article I, § 6, and the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, evidence of a pretrial identification of the defendant is inadmissible if the procedure used is “unnecessarily suggestive” (Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188 [1972]; People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241 [1981]; People v Owens, 74 NY2d 677 [1989]; People v Farraro, 144 AD2d 976 [4th Dept… [read post]
