Search for: "Bill Otis"
Results 201 - 220
of 265
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2011, 7:26 am
At Crime and Consequences, Bill Otis contends that there is only a “least bad” remedy in such situations and argues that because “the pre-trial defense lawyer was the problem, he’s the one who should pay the price. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:30 pm
Bill Otis at Crime & Consequences reacts skeptically to a Slate article suggesting that President Obama's election has something to do with this. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:44 am
Chamber of Commerce President Otis Rawl said passage of the tort reform law was his organization’s No. 1 priority this year. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:17 pm
Against Writs of Assistance, 1761, James Otis Origins of the Bill of Bill of Rights, by Leonard Levy Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
Bill Otis comments on the post at Crime and Consequences, arguing that “the majority’s discernment of a national consensus against the death penalty for child rape was astounding in its disingenuity. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:21 pm
Bill Otis's take on it is here. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:08 pm
In the blogosphere, Kent Scheidegger and Bill Otis had several posts critical of the decision at Crime and Consequences, while the PolitiCal blog of the Los Angeles Times reports on reactions by various state officials in California – as well as the possibility that the ruling will “bolster efforts by Gov. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:39 pm
See Bill Otis's previous post here.Court Rules Man is Sane Enough to Drop Appeals and Be Executed: Eric Connor of Greenville Online (SC) reports that Jeffrey Motts, 35, is scheduled to die by lethal injection on May 6th after the Supreme Court found him to be competent enough to waive his appeals. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:50 am
Bill Otis says the fat lady sang, and her pitch was perfect.On remand, the Fifth Circuit did the unthinkable just about what one would expect: they affirmed Skilling's conspiracy conviction despite the Supreme Court's ruling under harmless error. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
(EDTexweblog.com) Otis – Repeated failure to comply with discovery obligations warrants terminating and evidentiary sanctions: Shindler Elevator Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 8:37 am
Many of them looked at their professor/prosecutor who nodded and said,He's right.The states that kill, like Bill Otis, think it's really important. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:49 am
I don't often agree with SL&P commenter Bill Otis, but he was spot on when he declared, "I have no idea if the prosecution is frivolous, but I'm sure the prosecutor is. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:18 pm
Bill Otis has an interesting analysis of the contradiction here.Previous VC posts on the subject of Miranda and public safety can be found here. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 3:23 pm
In a post earlier today, Bill Otis describes the Clinton Administration's attempt to subvert the Act of Congress that sought to abrogate the Miranda rule. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 9:38 am
Over at Crime and Consequences Kent Scheidegger and Bill Otis will happily expound on why Spisak should be killed and the legal standards are way too generous to the criminally accused, convicted, and sentenced. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 10:51 am
From my article Privately Ordered Participatory Management: When Bill Gore founded W. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:07 am
I wonder if readers and regular commentors like Bill Otis or federalism or Supremacy Claus or others will be interested in having their names on the big screen. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 1:09 pm
Thirty-two minutes after Doug posted about the Lake Research Poll, Bill Otis put up a comment with the declaration that the poll reveals DPIC exploring new ground in embarrassing itself. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 3:12 am
Bill got suckered. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
I’m sure that Otis and Hancock as well as James Madison and who wrote the Bill of Rights based on George Mason’s Virginia Declaration of Rights would have found the risk de minimus and worth taking in order to preserve our fundamental rights. [read post]
