Search for: "Billings v. Billings" Results 81 - 100 of 28,562
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2012, 3:00 pm
Currently, the billed versus paid amount being submitted to a jury is controlled by the Missouri Supreme Court case of Deck v Teasley. [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:17 pm by Simon Gibbs
Dominic Regan’s blog summarising Motto & Ors v Trafigura Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 90201 (Costs): “£107,707,772.72 - That was the amount of the bill presented by Leigh Day to the defendants in the Trafigura pollution injury claims where it was ultimately accepted that most claimants had flu like symptoms. ... [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:35 pm by Amanda Traphagan
The Texas Fourteenth Court of Appeals issued its opinion Tuesday in Hegar v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 6:17 am by Tim Zubizarreta
Republicans hope this bill will provide an opportunity for the court to revisit Roe v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 6:41 am by Darius Whelan
  Ireland is not directly tackling the problem of the "Bournewood gap" and ECHR case-law such as H.L. v UK; Stanev v Bulgaria; D.D. v Lithuania and other cases.RecommendationThe IMHLA recommends that the Bill should state that if a person is being admitted to any residential centre, this can only occur on a voluntary basis, where the person has capacity to consent to such admission and does consent to such admission. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:13 pm by Family Law
From National Review The bill, called the “Roe Act,” defines “mental health” in the exact same expansive language that the Supreme Court used in the Roe v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:40 am by Sally-Ann Underhill
With the rise in usage of electronic trading systems, the recent judgment in Glencore v MSC[5] (albeit currently under appeal) provides a timely reminder that the release of cargo should only be made in accordance with the contract evidenced by the bill of lading, even where an electronic release system for cargo is being operated. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:40 am by Sally-Ann Underhill
With the rise in usage of electronic trading systems, the recent judgment in Glencore v MSC[5] (albeit currently under appeal) provides a timely reminder that the release of cargo should only be made in accordance with the contract evidenced by the bill of lading, even where an electronic release system for cargo is being operated. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 11:38 am by Erica Villanueva
Recently, the California Court of Appeal decided County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:50 pm by Russell Powell
v=TRmw1Su21iw The bill is expected to be signed by the governor on Monday. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 8:35 pm by David M. McLain
  That bill, sponsored by Senator Morse, was intended to legislatively overturn the 2008 Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 10:12 am by Alfred Brophy
I am sorry to report that long-time University of Tulsa law professor Bill Rice passed away over the weekend. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:28 am
The pipeline industry bill intended to "fix" the issues raised by Texas Rice Land Partners v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:45 pm
But it has summarily reversed judgments upholding such two-house vetoes -- see, e.g., United States Senate v. [read post]