Search for: "Billups v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2011, 9:46 am
By Jason Rantanen Billups-Rothenberg, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:00 am
” Fiers v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 1:36 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:24 am
United States Court of Appeals CRIMINAL OPINION Sentencing Career offender enhancement Restraining a person against his will is a violent crime under U.S.S.G. 4B1.2. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 7:20 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit: NAACP v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm
In favor of the Condemned Ex parte Kenneth Eugene Billups (In re: Kenneth Eugene Billups v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 3:25 am
In Sheffer v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 12:08 pm
Supreme Court case, Boykin v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 1:51 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 8:27 am
Billups, 442 F. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 7:40 pm
Other Notable State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 8:19 pm
The court applied the harmless-error analysis because the evidence was still technically allowable for consideration, citing the 2010 finding in Billups v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:35 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 3:51 pm
The case is Billups v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 4:54 am
Highlights this week included: US: Federal Trade Commission issues report on reverse settlement agreements in FY2010 (Patent Docs) (Orange Book Blog) (FDA Law Blog) US: Billups-Rothenberg v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 8:43 am
” Id. at 6 (citing Billups -Rothenberg, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Evans, No. 95-335 (Charlottesville 1996)(insurer's statements); Billups v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
The Claim in Brent v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 2:42 pm
Courts have regularly applied the rationality standard in upholding special conditions requiring convicted sex offenders to secure residences approved by the Division of Parole prior to release from DOCS custody to parole supervision as in Breeden v Donelli, Lynch v West, Billups v New York State Division of Parole and Wilson v Keane. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:53 pm
Courts have regularly applied the rationality standard in upholding special conditions requiring convicted sex offenders to secure residences approved by the Division of Parole prior to release from DOCS custody to parole supervision as in Breeden v Donelli, Lynch v West, Billups v New York State Division of Parole and Wilson v Keane. [read post]
