Search for: "Bing v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 174
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2017, 3:39 am by tracey
Supreme Court O’Connor v Bar Standards Board [2017] UKSC 78 (6 December 2017) Dover District Council v CPRE Kent [2017] UKSC 79 (6 December 2017) High Court (Administrative Court) T v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] EWHC 3181 (Admin) (07 December 2017) Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) v Smith [2017] EWHC 3193 (Admin) (07 December 2017) O’Connell, R (On the Application Of) v Westminster Magistrates’ Court [2017] EWHC… [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
Privacy as a Security Value, Jon Bing: En Hyllest A Tribute, 2014, ISBN: 9788205468504 [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
That was and will be the broadest statute to revive SOLs in the United States, because the Supreme Court considered the law and held that criminal SOLs may not be revived, because that would violate the Ex Post Facto Clause in Stogner v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:00 am by Zach Abels
“Not one man in a hundred will stand up to a real killer,” Mattis once remarked to the author Bing West. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 2:45 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2017-02-11 https://t.co/7lED1yoHpU -> Copyright subsists in standards AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:52 pm by John Elwood
That means we’re basically in the middle of a year-long Netflix binge – only way, way weirder. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:44 am by Ron Coleman
 Well, first, the standard — enunciated for the first time in DC Comics v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 6:30 am by The BNA Act 1867
These Governors would take advice from the Queen’s Privy Council in Canada, which consisted primarily of the members of the federal Cabinet.4 The Queen remained as the head of state, meaning that any legislation passed needed her (or, at a later time, the King's) approval. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 2:04 am
 | Weekly roundup: Friday Fun Never too late 107 [week ending on Sunday 31 July] Article 28 declarations |Costs of ISP blocking injunctions |Friday Fantasies, featuring legal challenges to Brexit and  more |Huawei v Samsung |Hospira v Genentech |Questions on Article 3(b) SPC referred to CJEU |Book Review: Trade Secret Protection |Pokémon GoNever too late 106 [week ending on Sunday 24 July] |… [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 12:50 pm
.* When its comes to "deadwood", leave it in the State of South Dakota and out of Trademark Office policyIs unused "deadwood"really cluttering up trade mark registers? [read post]