Search for: "Birch v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2017, 1:05 am by HAZEL WRIGHT, HUNTERS SOLICITORS
Court may hear wife’s application to be released from undertaking to sell former matrimonial home In Birch v Birch [2017] UKSC 53, the Supreme Court by a majority of 4:1 granted the wife’s appeal and remitted for urgent hearing her application to be released from an undertaking in recitals to a consent order made on 28 Jul 2010. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 10:15 am by Stefanie Levine
Svensson, Partner at Birch Stewart Kolasch & Birch, sent in this post discussing the recent McKesson Technologis v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 10:15 am by Stefanie Levine
Svensson, Partner at Birch Stewart Kolasch & Birch, sent in this post discussing the recent McKesson Technologis v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court remitted the inquiry into whether the court’s jurisdiction to vary the undertaking should be exercised to the lower court, stating that, in light of the equivalence of the wife’s undertaking with a s 24A order for sale, the inquiry will be conducted in accordance with s 31(7), giving first consideration to the welfare of the children, though this consideration may be outweighed by other factors. [read post]
17 May 2022, 6:11 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
 In an effort to avoid summary judgment, Birch points to evidence that one defendant texted Birch, stating "we feel like we live next to an asylum. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 3:36 am
National Geographic Society II, 97-03924-CV, reversed a separate panel's 2001 opinion, Greenberg v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 8:16 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF THE WORKER’S COMPENSATION CLAIM OF: DON BIRCH v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 9:23 am by Stefanie Levine
The following guest post was written by Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch Partner Mark J. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:56 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
River Birch,Inc., 920 F.3d 958, 964 (5th Cir. 2019); Eli Lilly & Co. v.Hospira, Inc., 933 F.3d 1320, 1327 (Fed. [read post]