Search for: "Birchfield v. North Dakota" Results 1 - 20 of 158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2023, 10:15 am by Shea Denning
North Dakota, 579 U.S. 438 (2016), this testing must comport not only with statutory requirements but also must satisfy the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 1:48 pm by Lawrence Taylor
What Can Affect California DUI Blood Test Results? [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 5:17 am by Kirk Anderson
North Dakota case, Daniel Birchfield was involved in an accident that resulted in his car landing in a ditch in North Dakota. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 6:00 am by Andrew Hamm
North Dakota is substantive and therefore applies retroactively. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 6:57 am by Mike Worgul
Supreme Court Case known as Birchfield v North Dakota offered a strong legal precedent that had been used by many people arrested for suspected DUI. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 7:16 am by Patrick@nimblelight.com
In the 2013 case Birchfield v North Dakota, the Supreme Court ruled that warrantless blood tests were a violation of the Fourth Amendment but upheld implied consent laws that require drivers to submit to breathalyzer tests. [read post]